The Left is trying to prosecute former President Donald Trump for words they assert fueled the Jan. 6 "insurrection". Will they apply same principle for words which fueled "assassination" attempt?
Of course I'm not "cheering the shooter!" Where'd that stupid statement come from?! And, yes, Democrats targeted then President Donald Trump for fueling the violence that was an '“insurrection.” As many Republicans and Independents tageted then President Donald Trump as well. Give me a break!
Trump did make a speech that encouraged his supporters to protest the election result, which was wrong, as the Courts had already thrown out just about every challenge, sans one! We all know, and you do as well, that "the violence that took place" was an "insurrection." It was not "merely the result of America's polarized anger that boiled over among some of the protestors that is now being exploited by Trump foes like Democrat Biden and Republican Liz Cheney?" What rights do we have to take our anger out on innocent people? Yes, the workers at the Capitol that were harmed and killed were innocent!
Trump and his supporters had absolutely no right to declare that the election had been stolen, as they had not proven it in the Courts. This was January, Man. It was time to certify the election. Any anger by supporters should have ended by the certification date. You, and everyone else in this country knew that the election was over for Trump. There should have been no one at the Capitol but both chambers of Congress
and perhaps others only interested to see democracy at work. You talk just as crazy, and then say that "(you) don't believe the election was stolen but that really isn’t the issue. I say it is. It was not the "political rhetoric" turned it into evidence of an “insurrection.” It was an insurrection!
Trump isn't likely to be reelected, so, I have no worries or concerns about his opening any investigations. The American people are not stupid - at least not the majority. We don't want a king, other than King Jesus! My response to your ridiculous statements is what I meant by is "That all you got?" You have nothing! And, your response to me - since you didn't understand my response - proves that you really don't get it! I've been reading your columns since your Daily Southtown days, and found you again writing for the Regional when I moved to the South Suburbs. That's more than forty-five years. You used to be sensible. What the heck has happened to you?! So, do understand that at our ages we need to speak like we understand all sides of the political spectrum. I see now that you no longer do. You’ve lost your objectivity, and your grasp of discernment. Even more so, you don't know how to read and understand responses to your columns, so, you take offense because you misinterpreted what I said? And, foolishly attack me - one of your readers, with such a dumbfounded accusation. "Cheering the shooter?!" Who the hell cheers a freaking murderer?
"One of the crazies out there? Not happy with politics, claims to support both sides? If you don't like it don't come back ... go stew in your own cesspool and argue with yourself ...?" A perfect description of who you are, as that is what you should be saying to yourself!
Am I "cheering the shooter?" What an ignorant statement to make! I can't get over your making that idiotic assertion. Though I believe you only made it out of misinterpreted, misplaced, and of course, ignorance. When you don't understand what a reader is saying, try asking for an understanding or at least ask for clarification. Am I "cheering the shooter?" What a stupid thing to say to anyone!
You really need to learn how to write to clearly convey your views, as extreme and as vicious as they are. Your distortion of facts, statements are indicative that you only have a political agenda that serves your interest rather than the truth. Pathetic.
What, are you cheering the shooter? One of the crazies out there? Not happy with politics, claims to support both sides? If you don't like it don't come back ... go stew in your own cesspool and argue with yourself ...
Of course I'm not "cheering the shooter!" Where'd that stupid statement come from?! And, yes, Democrats targeted then President Donald Trump for fueling the violence that was an '“insurrection.” As many Republicans and Independents tageted then President Donald Trump as well. Give me a break!
Trump did make a speech that encouraged his supporters to protest the election result, which was wrong, as the Courts had already thrown out just about every challenge, sans one! We all know, and you do as well, that "the violence that took place" was an "insurrection." It was not "merely the result of America's polarized anger that boiled over among some of the protestors that is now being exploited by Trump foes like Democrat Biden and Republican Liz Cheney?" What rights do we have to take our anger out on innocent people? Yes, the workers at the Capitol that were harmed and killed were innocent!
Trump and his supporters had absolutely no right to declare that the election had been stolen, as they had not proven it in the Courts. This was January, Man. It was time to certify the election. Any anger by supporters should have ended by the certification date. You, and everyone else in this country knew that the election was over for Trump. There should have been no one at the Capitol but both chambers of Congress
and perhaps others only interested to see democracy at work. You talk just as crazy, and then say that "(you) don't believe the election was stolen but that really isn’t the issue. I say it is. It was not the "political rhetoric" turned it into evidence of an “insurrection.” It was an insurrection!
Trump isn't likely to be reelected, so, I have no worries or concerns about his opening any investigations. The American people are not stupid - at least not the majority. We don't want a king, other than King Jesus! My response to your ridiculous statements is what I meant by is "That all you got?" You have nothing! And, your response to me - since you didn't understand my response - proves that you really don't get it! I've been reading your columns since your Daily Southtown days, and found you again writing for the Regional when I moved to the South Suburbs. That's more than forty-five years. You used to be sensible. What the heck has happened to you?! So, do understand that at our ages we need to speak like we understand all sides of the political spectrum. I see now that you no longer do. You’ve lost your objectivity, and your grasp of discernment. Even more so, you don't know how to read and understand responses to your columns, so, you take offense because you misinterpreted what I said? And, foolishly attack me - one of your readers, with such a dumbfounded accusation. "Cheering the shooter?!" Who the hell cheers a freaking murderer?
"One of the crazies out there? Not happy with politics, claims to support both sides? If you don't like it don't come back ... go stew in your own cesspool and argue with yourself ...?" A perfect description of who you are, as that is what you should be saying to yourself!
Am I "cheering the shooter?" What an ignorant statement to make! I can't get over your making that idiotic assertion. Though I believe you only made it out of misinterpreted, misplaced, and of course, ignorance. When you don't understand what a reader is saying, try asking for an understanding or at least ask for clarification. Am I "cheering the shooter?" What a stupid thing to say to anyone!
You really need to learn how to write to clearly convey your views, as extreme and as vicious as they are. Your distortion of facts, statements are indicative that you only have a political agenda that serves your interest rather than the truth. Pathetic.
Really Ray?! That's all you got?!
What, are you cheering the shooter? One of the crazies out there? Not happy with politics, claims to support both sides? If you don't like it don't come back ... go stew in your own cesspool and argue with yourself ...