Democrats desperate to stop Independent candidacy of Jill Stein
Concern about the growing weakness of President Joe Biden as a candidate is pushing Democrats to seek alternative strategies to block 3rd party candidates, including in Nevada
By Ray Hanania
FREE/Presidential Politics/Monday, June 17, 2024
President Joe Biden’s re-elecionc ampaign is so week that many of his party supporters are pursuing alternative ways to prevent him from loosing votes not only to former President Donald Trump but also to third party candidates.
In Nevada, for example, the Democratic Party is hoping to convince a judge to remove Dr. Jill Stein, the increasingly popular third party candidate for the Green Party, from the state’s president ballot.
Nevada is important to Biden. In 2020, Biden defeated Trump winning a narrow 50 percent of votes cast, or 703,486 votes. Trump received 47.67 percent of the vote, or 669,890 votes. The difference of only 33,596 votes separated the two candidates. But exactly 33,000 votes were cast against both candidates including for two challengers with the category “None of these candidates” receiving nearly half of the anti-Biden, anti-Trump votes.
With the #AbandonBiden campaign ramping up its popularity and taking significant votes away from the president, Nevada’s Democrats know they can’t sell the presidents agenda to win. They have to “steal the vote” by using the state legal system to remove Jill Biden from the ballot.
Stein’s volunteers filed candidate petitions to put Stein in the ballot signed by 29,584 voters, nearly three times more than what is required to be on the ballot in Nevada.
That near 30,000 number scares the Democrats so they filed a lawsuit demanding that Stein be removed, falsely claiming that the majority of the signatures are questionable because on one petition collection of 68 signatures, the Democrats assert that 48 were collected prior to filing the candidate petitions.
I have covered politics for more than 45 years, in Chicagoland where corruption in election is a given and no one calls claims that elections were stolen “a lie.” The biggest election theft occured in the 1960s presidential election between John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon when the Chicago Outfit fabricated voter filings to give Kennedy an edge over Nixon.
The outfit believed that in helping Kennedy win by stealing the election in Illinois, Kennedy’s father, Joseph, who had ties to the mob. Joseph Kennedy was a distributor of alcohol and had his own shipping lines to distribute alcohol through the country. Many people believed there was a tie between the Kennedy patrirach and the mob, although it could never be proven.
In fact, when Kennedy was elected, he named his brother Robert F. Kennedy as the U.S. Attorney and and RFK immediately targeted mob activities and the illegal acts of former FBI Chief J. Edgar Hoover who didn’t believe the mob was a serious problem compared to the rising influence of African Americans and Catholics, like the Kennedys.
The Nevada Democratic Party lawsuit was filed on June 10, 2024 in an effort to undermine and block Stein’s petition filing process long enough to keep her off the ballot and to entangle her in an expensive lawsuit to divert campaign funds away from her public campaign messaging,w hich is growing in popularity among many voters.
That’s how many Chicago political movements stole elections in Chicago, by preventing independent candidates from being placed on the ballot to challenge their party backed candidates.
For years, Democrats sued that process to prevent African Americans from unseating Chicago and Cook County’s Democratic system of “plantation politics” in which only Blacks handpicked by the White party leaders, could represent Black wards and suburban townships.
It’s still considered stealing an election when you prevent legally petition candidates from remaining on the ballot.
Stein called Nevada’s Democratic Party “the anti-Democratic Party”
“The anti-Democratic party has just gone on the attack. The Green Party of Nevada and volunteers in Nevada collected 30,000 signatures in Nevada, three times the number of signatures that’s actually required int he state. The state then approved our campaign to have a ballot line in Nevada. Within 24 hours, there goes the anti-Democratic party filing an injunction in court to stop our placement on the ballot,” Stein said in a Tiktok blast this week.
“We are going to go to court and fight this in court because it is outrageous. This is how full of ‘integrity,’ ‘inspiration” and ‘democratic values” the Democratic party is. This what they have been doing for decades.”
Stein accused the Democrat Party in the past of impersonating Green Party candidates in order to undermine challenges. … They are quaking in their boots. They know their days of controlling the political process are basically over. We the people will not continue to be thrown under the bus by the dirty tricks and corrupt Democratic Party.”
She urged voters to go to JillStein2024.com to help fight this corruption by Joe Biden and the Democratic Organization.
Critics might challenge the Democratic Party and call what the Democratic Party of Nevada is doing an anti-Semitic attack, considering that Jill Stein is the only Jewish candidate running for president in the 2024 Presidential election.
You can make a difference in this election by fighting voter theft, and political party corruption to deny the voters the right to vote for and select their candidate for President in the Nov. 5, 2024 presidential elections.
End political corruption by all political parties and restore American’s fundamental foundation as a truly Democratic nation that supports free speech and opposes all forms of tyranny including political tyranny.
Click here to read the lawsuit that was filed.
A note from Ray Hanania:
I need your support to continue to build up my audience to distribute independent, fair and accurate information about American politics out to the public. I abhor than one-sided partisan politics of the mainstream news media. They have transformed from professional news reporting to opinion advocacy in the guise of “fair and objective news reporting.”
Please consider subscribing, FREE or PAID.
Thank you.
###